Thomas v. Shonsey
Flora L. Thomas v. Michael Shonsey
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Fawcett, J.
From a decree of the district court for Merrick county, awarding defendant specific performance of ■ a contract for the sale to him by plaintiff of the northwest quarter of section 1, township 15, range 5 west, in said county, plaintiff appeals.
The errors assigned by plaintiff are that the findings and judgment of the court are not supported by the evidence, but are contrary to the facts and contrary to law. We do not think a discussion of the theories upon which plaintiff bases these assignments would be of benefit to the parties or to the profession at large. The only question for our determination- is: Did the district court err in granting defendant a specific performance of the contract involved? We have carefully examined the record and cannot say that the judgment of the trial court is wrong. On the contrary, we think it is right.
Affirmed.
Barnes, Rose and Sedgwick, JJ., not sitting.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.