TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Stewart

In re Stewart, 1 F.R.D. 105 (N.D. Cal. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, N.D. California · Federal District Courts
Decided
March 21, 1939
Docket
No. 21169-S
Judges
Sure
Citations
1 F.R.D. 1051 Fed. R. Serv. 6471939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1651

Opinion of the Court — Sure

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ST. SURE, District Judge.

Petitioner asks leave to file in forma pauperis under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. A. § 832 an application for a writ of mandamus. The petition fails to disclose a meritorious cause of action (Phillips v. McCauley, 9 Cir., 92 F.2d 790 ), and besides writs of mandamus have been abolished by 81(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The application is therefore denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Varlack v. Swc Caribbean, Inc.550 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1977)

Most recent

  1. Varlack v. Swc Caribbean, Inc.550 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Phillips v. McCauley, 92 F.2d 790 (9th Cir. 1937) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list