TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.

SHULTZ v. MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST CO. (two cases)

Shultz v. Mfrs. & Traders Trust Co., 1 F.R.D. 243 (W.D.N.Y. 1940)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, W.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
March 13, 1940
Docket
Nos. Eq. No. 2279, Civ. No. 182
Judges
Burke
Citations
1 F.R.D. 2431940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1907

Opinion of the Court — Burke

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BURKE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have moved pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order requiring the defendant Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company to produce and permit the inspection of the minutes of the meetings of its Board of Directors and its executive committee for the months of July through December, 1928 together with all papers referred to therein, also all pages of said defendant’s books of account reflecting extension of credit to any of the defendants to this suit and to numerous other persons not defendants.

The plaintiff is entitled to an inspection of such minutes of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the executive committee during the months of July through December, 1928, together with all papers therein referred to, that contain any resolution, discussion or reference to the matter of the purchase of, or to the matter of formation, participation in, or financing of a syndicate for the purchase of the Stock of Houde Engineering Corporation, or a loan to Frederick B. Cooley, or New York Car Wheel Company made on or about October 24, 1928, except such of said records as have been submitted to the Court in support of the pending motion for summary judgment. The defendant is also entitled to inspect such portions of the books of account that contain any record of or reference to the matters above referred to. The order may provide for such inspection at the offices of the bank after banking hours at a time to be agreed upon or fixed by the Court. Otherwise the motion is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11945: 11952: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hickman v. Taylor153 F.2d 212 (3d Cir. 1945)
  2. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.128 F.2d 889 (2d Cir. 1942)
  3. Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. Janas13 F.R.D. 199 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)

Most recent

  1. Colonial Airlines, Inc. v. Janas13 F.R.D. 199 (S.D.N.Y. 1952)
  2. Hickman v. Taylor153 F.2d 212 (3d Cir. 1945)
  3. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.128 F.2d 889 (2d Cir. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list