TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

M'Laughlin v. Long

M'Laughlin v. Long, 5 H. & J. 113 (1820)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1820
Judges
Buchanan, Earle, Johnson
Citations
5 H. & J. 113
Headnotes
tll^caseClunatme
Summary
Appeal from Baltimore county court. The appellant, (the plaintiff in the court below,) brought an action of trespass on the case against the appellee, to recover damages for an injury sustained by the plaintiff from a tortious of the defendant, in committing waste upon premises which the plaintiff was a lessee for years. A verdict was found for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court, upon the following case, yiz. The plaintiff had rented, for one year only, the room mentioned in the declaration-, wherein the waste was alleged to have been committed, and held the‘same as tenant only for one year, and rented it to the defendant for two years. The contract of renting to the defendant was in writing, and delivered to him. at the time it was made. That said room was part of a tenement which the plaintiff had rented for one year, and held as tenant for that time; and at the period of renting it to the defendant, the plaintiff took upon himself the chance of renting- the same from the owner of the freehold estate to which it belonged, for a second year. That the defendant occupied the room for nine months, and during that time the injury complained ofin the declaration was done. The court below gave-judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed to this court. cited Com. Big. tit. Action on-the Case, {A.) White vs. Wagner, in this court, June term 1818. Poultney vs. Holmes, 1 Strange, 405. Caghill vs. Freelove, 3 Mod. 325. Walker’s case, 3 Co. 24. 1 Saund. 241. West vs. Freude, Cro. Car. 187. Winn vs. White, 2 Blk. Rep. 840. Green vs. Cole, 3 Saund. 252. 1 Bae. Ab. 72j ¿r 2 Carnpb. 11. referred to Bae. Ab. tit. Waste, (G-.) 263. 1 Chit. Plead. 142. Goodright vs. Peters, 8 East. 190. 2 Chit. PI. 344, (n. 2.) 2 Saund. 252f (n. 7.) 3 Saund. 252. 2 Bla. Rep. 1111. 1 Taunt. 183. 4 Taunt. 764. 1 Saund. 323. b. (n. 7.) Bae. Ab. tit Waste, (J.) 271, 273. 2 Blk. Com. 178.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Buchanan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Buchanan, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from the judgment of Baltimore county court on a case stated, in- an action on the case, in nature of waste. [He here stated the evidence. 3 It is well settled that an action on the case, in nature of waste, may be brought, as well by him in remainder, for life or years, as in fee or in tail. But it has never been held to lie for one who has no interest either in remainder or reversion—the recovery being as for an injury done to the reversion. On no other ground can the action be maintained.

*115 In this case it cannot be pretended that the plaintiff had any estate, either in reversion or reipainijsr* He was himself but a tenant for one year, which was disclosed to the defendant at the time the room was rented, to whom he transferred all the interest he had in the premises, and nothing remained in him to be injured.

It is too plain a case to dwell upon.

JUDGMENT AEETB.MED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1827–1828: 11877–1878: 11925–1926: 118272026peak 1827 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Carroll v. Bowling133 A. 851 (Md. 1926)
  2. Dickinson v. Mayor of Baltimore48 Md. 583 (1878)
  3. Duvall v. Waters1 Md. Ch. 569 (1827)

Most recent

  1. Carroll v. Bowling133 A. 851 (Md. 1926)
  2. Dickinson v. Mayor of Baltimore48 Md. 583 (1878)
  3. Duvall v. Waters1 Md. Ch. 569 (1827)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list