Rodearmel v. Clinton
David C. Rodearmel v. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
On appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The District Court dismissed for lack of standing, 666 F. Supp. 2d 123, 127-131 , and n. 10 (DC 2009), so it did not enter “any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order upon the validity of the appointment and continuance in office of the Secretary of State under article I, section 6, clause 2, of the Constitution.” Joint Resolution on Compensation and Other Emoluments Attached to the Office of Secretary of State, § 1(b)(3)(A), Pub. L. 110-455, 122 Stat. 5036, note following 5 U.S.C. § 5312 . The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Same case below, 666 F. Supp. 2d 123 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.