TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wyman v. Wilmarth

Wyman v. Wilmarth, 44 N.W. 1151 (S.D. 1890)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 1, 1890
Judges
Bennett
Citations
44 N.W. 11511 S.D. 351890 S.D. LEXIS 8
Summary
Appeal from district court, Kingsbury county; Hon. James Spencer, judge. Motion to dismiss appeal. Denied. No briefs filed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Bennett

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Bennett, J.

This is an appeal from an order discharging an attachment made before judgment was rendered, and also an appeal upon its merits. The motion to dismiss the- appeal is based upon the ground that an order dismissing an attachment is not appealable. That question having been passed upon in Bank v. Carroll, (at this term,) must be considered as decisive of this. Motion to dismiss denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 119152026peak 1915 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank of Hecla v. Michael153 N.W. 1008 (S.D. 1915)

Most recent

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank of Hecla v. Michael153 N.W. 1008 (S.D. 1915)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list