Searle v. City of Lead
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Haney, J.
The judgment of the circuit court in this action having been affirmed (10 S. D. 312, 73 N. W, 101), defendant and appellant now appeals from the clerk’s taxation of costs. The plaintiff and respondent made no argument, either oral or printed. She should have been allowed five' dollars “before argument,” but nothing “for argument.” Comp. Laws, § 5187. The clerk is directed to deduct the sum allowed for argument, and, as thus modified, the taxation is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.