Bank of Iowa & Dakota v. Oliver
Bank of Iowa and Dakota v. Oliver
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Haney, J.
Appellant applies, upon notice, to amend his abstract by adding thereto an order of the circuit court, denying his motion for a new trial, made August 9, 1898. The appeal was taken September 18, 1898. Appellant’s application is supported by the affidavit of his attorney, from which it appears that the order denying a new trial was entered after this appeal was taken, by order of the circuit court, as of a date prior to the taking of the appeal.
It is held in the case of Martin v. Smith, decided at this term, 11 S. D. 437, 78 N. W. 1001 , that no appeal lies until the judgment or order has been entered as a permanent record of the court below; that the rights of the parties in respect to an appeal are determined by the date of the actual entry of the *445 judgment or order, and cannot be affected by the entry thereof, nunc pro tunc, as of a prior date; and that this rule is not modified by Comp. Laws, § 5235. Upon the authorities cited, and for the reasons stated in that case, it yrould be idle for appellant to amend his abstract, by printing this notice of appeal, as his application shows it cannot be reviewed upon this appeal. The application to amend is denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.