TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Houts v. Olson

Houts v. Olson, 85 N.W. 1015 (S.D. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 4, 1901
Judges
Handy
Citations
85 N.W. 101514 S.D. 4751901 S.D. LEXIS 48
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
Comp. Laws, § 4856, relative to the time of commencing actions other than for the recovery of real estate, declares' that “an action for relief not hereinbefore provided for” must he commenced within ten years after the cause of action shall have accrued. Held, that an action for an accounting under a mortgage and to redeem from foreclosure was governed hy such section.
Summary
Appeal from circuit court, Turner county. Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Suit by W. A. Houts and others against Christ Olson to redeem certain lands from a mortgage thereon, and for an accounting of rents and profits, suit being commenced more than io years after foreclosure sale, and more than ten years before the commencement of continued possession of the premises on the part of the purchaser at mortgage sale, and defendant claiming under him. From a decree in favor of defendant, complainants appeal.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Handy

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Handy, J.

This action not having been commenced within ten years after the cause accrued, it is, for the reasons given in Houts *476 v. Hoyne, 14 S. D.—, 84 N. W. 773 , barred under Section 4856, Comp. Laws, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Leslie v. Smith234 N.W. 669 (S.D. 1931)

Most recent

  1. Leslie v. Smith234 N.W. 669 (S.D. 1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Houts v. Hoyne, 84 N.W. 773 (S.D. 1900) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list