TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People's Bank v. Mears

People's Bank v. Mears, 86 N.W. 634 (S.D. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 12, 1901
Judges
Fuller
Citations
86 N.W. 63414 S.D. 5781901 S.D. LEXIS 62
Disposition
Affirmed.
Syllabus
In view of Comp. Laws, § 1639, providing that a tax deed shall be conclusive evidence of the truth of all the facts therein recited, and prima facie evidence of the regularity of all the proceedings; and Laws 1891, chap. 14, § 121, providing that said tax deed shall vest in the grantee an absolute estate in fee simple in such land — on an appeal in an action to quiet title the validity of tax deeds establishing plaintiffs title will not be reviewed where the only assignment in appellant's brief was that "the tax deeds offered were void on their face,” and that “the tax list of 1890 effectually disposes of the tax deed.”
Summary
Appeal from circuit court, Edmunds county. Hon. Boring E. Gaffy, Judge. Action by the People’s Bank against E. Ashley Mears and others to quiet title to certain realty. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Fuller

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Fuller, P. J.

Judgment quieting in plaintiff the title to certain real property was entered in this action between rival claimants, and the defendant E. Ashley Mears appeals. In support of its claim of fee-simple ownership, respondent put in evidence two tax deeds, each regular on its face, and sufficient to convey the lands to the respective grantees named therein, through whom respondent derevied title, as shown by two valid quitclaim deeds offered and received in evidence. As appellant relied wholly on a transcribed judgment, which had, long before the commencement of this action, ceased to be a lien on real property, he now claims no interest in any of the land described in the complaint. The mere statement that “the tax deeds offered are each void ón their face,” and that “the *579 tax list for 1890 effectually disposes of the tax deed to Darlington,” is not sufficient to justify extended research concerning points not otherwise mentioned in appellant’s brief. The law is that “such deed shall be conclusive evidence of the truth of all the facts therein recited, and prima facie evidence of the regularity of all the proceedings from the valuation of the land by the assessor up to the execution of the deed.” and “said,deed shall vest in the grantee an absolute estate in fee simple in such land, subject, however, to all claims which the state may have therein for taxes or liens or incumbrances.” Comp. Laws, § 1639; Section 121, Chap. 14, Laws 1891. As our attention is directed to no particular irregularity in the tax proceedings, or defects in the deeds upon which respondent relies, and no error is in any manner pointed out or discoverable, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list