Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
NORTHERN PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. MARATHON PIPE LINE COMPANY and United States
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Upon consideration of the motion of the Solicitor General to extend stay of judgment, and the responses thereto, it is ordered that the Clerk shall further stay the sending of the certified copy of the judgment to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota to and including December 24, 1982.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(staying the effective date of the Northern Pipeline decision until 24 December 1982 to give Congress an opportunity to act)
Cited by 25 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- United States v. Harchar
- In re Jordan
- George I. Benny and Alexandra Benny, Debtors. Alexandra Benny v. John M. England, Trustee, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, Etc., United States of America v. John M. England, Trustee, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, Etc.
- Benny v. England
- Boise City Farmers Cooperative v. Jim Palmer
- In re Rubin
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.