Welch v. Synoground
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Corson, J.
The abstract in this case was filed in this court on March 9, 1903, and the case placed on the April, 1903, calendar, and regularly submitted for decision under rule 21 of this court. Although more than six months have elapsed since such submission, no brief has been filed on the part of the appellant, and m such case this court will presume that the appeal has been abandoned, and will either dismiss the same or affirm the judgment, as it may deem proper. Benedict v. Smith, 10 S. D. 35, 71 N. W. 139 ; Giles v. Hawkeye M. Co., 11 S. D. 222, 76 N. W. 928 ; Russel v. Deadwood Development Co. 16 S. D. 644 94 N. W. 693 . In this case the appeal will be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.