TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Erickson v. Stevenson

Erickson v. Stevenson, 110 N.W. 36 (S.D. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 30, 1906
Judges
Corson, Haney
Citations
110 N.W. 3621 S.D. 961906 S.D. LEXIS 90
Disposition
Affirmed.-
Headnotes
Where appellant files no abstract or brief, the appeal is deemed abandoned and the judgment will be affirmed. • , '
Summary
Appeal from Circuit Court,- Moody County. --Hon. Josépi-i- W. JonUS, Judge. . ■ -Action-by Regina- Erickson against Andrew. G. .Stevenson. Fróm'a-judgment ih 'favor of-plaintiff, .defendant'appeals:-

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Haney

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

HANEY, J.

This cause was submitted under rule 21, at April term, 1905. Appellant having filed no abstract or brief, the appeal is deemed abandoned; State v. Allison, 21 S. D. — 108 N. W. 556 ; Benedict v. Smith, 10 S. D. 35, 71 N. W. 139 ; Giles v. Mining Co., 11 S. D. 222, 76 N. W. 928 , and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

CORSON, J., not sitting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Benedict v. Smith, 71 N.W. 139 (S.D. 1897) 6
Giles v. Hawkeye Gold-Mining Co., 76 N.W. 928 (S.D. 1898) 3
State ex rel. Christianson v. Allison, 108 N.W. 556 (S.D. 1906) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list