Dunkley v. Rega Properties, Ltd.

J. Reed DUNKLEY, et ux. v. REGA PROPERTIES, LTD.

Dunkley v. Rega Props., Ltd., 498 U.S. 898 (1990)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: October 9, 1990
Docket: No. 90-287
Judges: Consideration, Took
Citations: 498 U.S. 898111 S. Ct. 251112 L. Ed. 2d 20959 U.S.L.W. 32761990 U.S. LEXIS 5193

Cited by 40 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Denied.

Justice SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(motion citing Local Rule 3(j), predecessor to the present Local Rule 6.3)

Lichtenberg v. Besicorp Group Inc., 204 F.3d 397 (2d Cir. 2000)

Cited by 40 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Hollingsworth949 F. Supp. 77 (D. Conn. 1996)
Brenton National Bank of Des Moines v. Ross492 N.W.2d 441 (Iowa Ct. App. 1992)
Lowrance v. Achtyl20 F.3d 529 (2d Cir. 1994)
Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.333 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2003)
Linda B. Jones v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America223 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2000)
State v. Golotta837 A.2d 359 (N.J. 2003)

Most recent

Kinney v. Connecticut622 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Conn. 2009)
Kinney v. State941 A.2d 907 (Conn. 2008)
State v. Golotta837 A.2d 359 (N.J. 2003)
John and Joyce Silivanch, Felice and Frances Defrancesco, Raymond and Mary Hague, Carol and Richard Lorenzo Dorothy Cantone, Kevin L. Jenkins, William, Kathleen, William Jr., and Kimberly Buck, Ronald and Sima Cesarski, Michael and Doris Sckipp, Fran and Rita Galante, Mary and Louis B. Montes, Jane King, Clare Dillon, and Mary Purcell v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc., and Fantasia Cruising, Inc. v333 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2003)
Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.333 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2003)
Lichtenberg v. Besicorp Group Inc.204 F.3d 397 (2d Cir. 2000)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list