TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force

Charles T. Sherwin v. United States Air Force, an and Ronald G. Sprovero Ronald L. Billmyer A.D. Talley B.R. Henderson Celia Smith Laverne Harper M.R. Peters Robert Cutrell Robert Stroebel Donald Robinson Jeff Osborne Brad Adams William Waller R.S. Burrus

Sherwin v. U.S. Air Force, 37 F.3d 1495 (4th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 11, 1994
Docket
No. 92-1678
Citations
37 F.3d 14951994 WL 5513341994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34872

Opinion

37 F.3d 1495 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles T. SHERWIN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Defendant Appellee, AN and Ronald G. SPROVERO; Ronald L. Billmyer; A.D. Talley; B.R. Henderson; Celia Smith; Laverne Harper; M.R. Peters; Robert Cutrell; Robert Stroebel; Donald Robinson; Jeff Osborne; Brad Adams; William Waller; R.S. Burrus, Defendants.

No. 92-1678.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted September 20, 1993. Decided October 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR)

Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles T. Sherwin appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant on his complaint alleging a violation of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552a (West 1977 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. United States Air Force, No. CA-90-34-3-CIV-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list