Millard v. United States

Arthur Frank MILLARD v. UNITED STATES

Millard v. United States, 500 U.S. 916 (1991)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: May 13, 1991
Docket: No. 90-1276
Citations: 500 U.S. 916111 S. Ct. 2012114 L. Ed. 2d 9959 U.S.L.W. 37691991 U.S. LEXIS 2746

Cited by 16 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(holding that a penalty assessment under § 914(f) of the LHWCA is a “supplementary order declaring the amount of the default” within the meaning of § 918(a) and hence governed by Rule 6(a))

Burgo v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 122 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 1997)

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

DeTienne v. DeTienne815 F. Supp. 394 (D. Kan. 1993)
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. James Barry and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor41 F.3d 903 (3d Cir. 1994)
Sea-Land Svc. v. BarryNo. 94-3026 (3d Cir. Dec. 7, 1994)
United States v. Amjad Awan, Akbar A. Bilgrami, Sibte Hassan, Syed Aftab Hussain, Ian Howard966 F.2d 1415 (11th Cir. 1992)
Clemons v. State720 So. 2d 961 (Ala. Crim. App. 1996)
NCNB Texas National Bank v. Johnson11 F.3d 1260 (5th Cir. 1994)

Most recent

Foreness v. Hexamer971 S.W.2d 525 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1997)
Manuel Burgo, Jr. v. General Dynamics Corporation122 F.3d 140 (2d Cir. 1997)
West Virginia Mining and Reclamation Ass'n v. Babbitt970 F. Supp. 506 (S.D.W. Va 1997)
Burgo v. General Dynamics960 F. Supp. 11 (D. Conn. 1996)
Clemons v. State720 So. 2d 961 (Ala. Crim. App. 1996)
Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. James Barry and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor41 F.3d 903 (3d Cir. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list