Mitan v. United States

Jason MITAN v. UNITED STATES

Mitan v. United States, 506 U.S. 1059 (1993)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: January 11, 1993
Docket: No. 92-6420
Citations: 506 U.S. 1059113 S. Ct. 994122 L. Ed. 2d 14561 U.S.L.W. 34781993 U.S. LEXIS 211

Cited by 4 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(finding that counsel exceeded the limits of zealous advocacy and that the trial judge properly exercised control of the proceeding)

United States v. Mohammad, 53 F.3d 1426 (7th Cir. 1995)
(noting that the district court does not have to “give a proposed instruction if the essential elements are covered by those that are given.”)

United States v. Ashley, 54 F.3d 311 (7th Cir. 1995)

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

U.S. Courts of Appeals4

Relies on it most ⓘ

United States v. Bernard Wilson, Luis Luna, and Manuel Garcia134 F.3d 855 (7th Cir. 1998)
United States v. Mohammad S. Mohammad, Also Known as Sean Saleh, and Asad Saleh53 F.3d 1426 (7th Cir. 1995)
Delbert W. Coleman and Karen A. Graham v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue16 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 1994)
United States v. Billy R. Ashley, Shaunessy R. Sylvester, Craig Crofton54 F.3d 311 (7th Cir. 1995)

Most recent

United States v. Bernard Wilson, Luis Luna, and Manuel Garcia134 F.3d 855 (7th Cir. 1998)
United States v. Mohammad S. Mohammad, Also Known as Sean Saleh, and Asad Saleh53 F.3d 1426 (7th Cir. 1995)
United States v. Billy R. Ashley, Shaunessy R. Sylvester, Craig Crofton54 F.3d 311 (7th Cir. 1995)
Delbert W. Coleman and Karen A. Graham v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue16 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 1994)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list