Anderson v. United States

Roy ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES

Anderson v. United States, 507 U.S. 925 (1993)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 22, 1993
Docket: No. 92-6715
Citations: 507 U.S. 925113 S. Ct. 1296122 L. Ed. 2d 68761 U.S.L.W. 35821993 U.S. LEXIS 1339

Cited by 127 6 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 6 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(allowing the admission of photographs of a deceased, although cumulative and possibly tending to inflame the jury)

Jackson v. State, 674 So. 2d 1318 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)
(The trial court acknowledge in its finding that it carefully considered a presentence report which contained a substantial victim impact statement that had been previously ruled inadmissible)

Sockwell v. State, 675 So. 2d 4 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)
(defendant convicted of murder committed for hire and during a robbery)

Ex Parte Scott, 728 So. 2d 172 (Ala. 1998)

Cited by 127 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Maples v. State758 So. 2d 1 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
Arthur v. State711 So. 2d 1031 (Ala. Crim. App. 1996)
Wilson v. State777 So. 2d 856 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
McWhorter v. State781 So. 2d 257 (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
Sockwell v. State675 So. 2d 4 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)
Boyd v. State715 So. 2d 825 (Ala. Crim. App. 1997)

Most recent

Russell v. State272 So. 3d 1134 (Ala. Crim. App. 2017)
Townes v. State253 So. 3d 447 (Ala. Crim. App. 2015)
Russell v. State261 So. 3d 397 (Ala. Crim. App. 2015)
Shanklin v. State187 So. 3d 734 (Ala. Crim. App. 2014)
Wiggins v. State193 So. 3d 765 (Ala. Crim. App. 2014)
Carruth v. State165 So. 3d 627 (Ala. Crim. App. 2014)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list