Sioux Falls National Bank v. Wingfield

SIOUX FALLS NATIONAL BANK of Sioux Falls v. WINGFIELD, Public Examiner, Appellant MINNEHAHA NATIONAL BANK v. WINGFIELD, Public Examiner, Appellant SECURITY NATIONAL BANK v. WINGFIELD, Public Examiner, Appellant SCANDINAVIAN-AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK v. WINGFIELD, Public Examiner

Sioux Falls Nat'l Bank v. Wingfield, 157 N.W. 115 (S.D. 1916)

Court: South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided: April 3, 1916
Docket: No. Files Nos. 3935-3936-3937-3938
Citations: 157 N.W. 11537 S.D. 1581916 S.D. LEXIS 28
Disposition: Affirmed.

Cited by 0

Headnotes

Appeals — Failure to File Brief per Stipulation — Abandonment of Appeal — Affirmance. Where appellant failed to file brief pursuant to stipulation extending time therefor, and appellant being in default, the-appeals will be deemed abandoned, and orders appealed from affirmed. ■

Summary

Appeals from 'Circuit Oourt, Minnehaha County. PIon-Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Four actions', one by the Sioux Falls National Bank, one by tbe Minnehaha National Rank, one by the Security National Bank, and one by the Scandinavian-American National Bank, alt of Sioux Fall's, South Dakota, against J. L. Wingfieldl as. Public Examiner and as ex-officioi Superintendent of Bank and Trust Companies of the State of South Dakota. Drum adverse orders defendant appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Time for service of appellant’s brief upon appeal in each of the above causes was, by order of court and by stipulation of counsel, extended to and including March io, 1916. No brief having been filed and appellant being in default, .the appeals are deemed abandoned, and1 the orders appealed from are affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list