Denton v. Butler
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
GATES, J.
This case relates to an alleged agreement by a landlord to pay a tenant for some fall plowing* done by him. The jury found for the tenant. From the judgment and an order denying a new trial, -defendant appeals.
The -assignments of error are two, viz.: “(i) There is no evidence to justify the verdict; and (2) errors of law occurring at the -trial.”
[1] Inasmuch as it does not -appear that all of the material evidence received upon the trial -is contained in appellant’s brief, the first assignment of error, even if it were sufficient, could not he considered. Chapter 172, Laws 1913; Supreme Court Rule 6 ( 140 N. W. viii ); Gilfillan v. Schaller, 32 S. D. 638, 144 N. W. 133 ; Peterson v. Miller, 33 S. D. 397, 146 N. W. 585 ; Hepner v. Wheatley, 33 S. D. 34, 144 N. W. 923 ; Smith v. Pence, 33 S. D. 516, 146 N. W. 709 ; Davis v. Davis, 36 S. D. 336, 154 N. W. 799 ; State v. Carmel, 36 S. D. 293, 154 N. W. 808 .
[2] The alleged error in- sustaining an objection to a certain question asked during the trial and argued in appellant’s brief is not presented f-o-r review by assignment of error No. 2, supra. Supreme Court rule 5 ( 140 N. W. viii ).
Finding noi error in the record, the judgment and order appealed from1 are affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.