TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike

State ex rel. Johnson v. Pike, 161 N.W. 813 (S.D. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 22, 1917
Docket
No. File No. 4150
Judges
Gates
Citations
161 N.W. 81338 S.D. 4461917 S.D. LEXIS 39
Disposition
Affirmed by divided court.
Headnotes
Apireáis — Disqualified Judge — Divided Court, No Daw for Substitute Judge — AfiSrmance. Where, on appeal to Supreme Court, one of the Judges of the Court is disqualified to sit in the case, and the remaining members are evenly divided upon the questions involved, and there being no law for calling in a substitute judge, the order appealed from will bet affirmed by a divided court. . ■
Summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Gregory County. Hon. William WILLIAMSON, Judge. Procéeding by the State of South Dakota, on the relation of Charles A. Johnson, again.st A. E. Pike and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Gates

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GATES, P.. J.

Smith, J., having" presided at the trial in circuit court-of the case of State ex rel. Simons v. Nyquist, 22 S. D. 200, 116 N. W. 754 , declines to participate in the decision of this appeal 'believing himself -disqualified. In that case the vital issues of this appeal were involved. The remaining members of this court being divided upon the questions involved herein, and there being no provision of law for calling in a substitute judge, the order appealed from is affirmed by a divided court. No costs will "be taxed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Veolay, Inc. v. United States21 C.C.P.A. 268 (C.C.P.A. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Veolay, Inc. v. United States21 C.C.P.A. 268 (C.C.P.A. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Simons v. Nyquist, 116 N.W. 754 (S.D. 1908) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list