TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Graber v. Schmidt

State ex rel. Graber v. Schmidt, 174 N.W. 951 (S.D. 1919)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 3, 1919
Docket
No. File No. 4569
Judges
Polley
Citations
174 N.W. 95142 S.D. 2941919 S.D. LEXIS 132
Headnotes
Practice — Demurrer to Complaint, Order Overruling With Permission to Answer, Affirmants of Appeal From, With Direction to Enter Judgment Below — Direction Stricken. Where an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, which granted appellant permission -to answer the merits with- ’ in a specified time, is affirmed on appeal, the opinion of Supreme Court affirming the order and directing trial court to enter judgment for relator, will be modified by striking out such direction. So held on petition for rehearing.
Summary
On rehearing. A direction of Supreme Court to trial court to enter judgment for relator on affirmance of the order appealed from, stricken out; rehearing denied.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Polley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

POLLEY, J.

In his petition for rehearing, counsel for appellant call our attention to the fact that the order appealed from granted appellant permission to answer to the merits within the five days after entering said order. This fact was overlooked when the opinion was prepared and, as it was not our intention to deprive appellant of any privilege granted by the trial court, the opinion herein filed on the 15th day of August, 1919, is hereby modified, by striking out the direction to the trial court to enter judgment for the relator.

With this modification, the order appealed from is affirmed, and the rehearing is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list