TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Guffey

State v. Guffey, 176 N.W. 521 (S.D. 1920)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 19, 1920
Docket
No. File No. 4610
Judges
Smith
Citations
176 N.W. 52142 S.D. 5321920 S.D. LEXIS 30
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Headnotes
Appeals — Order Denying Motion to Dismiss ¡Prosecution, Whether Appealable — Statute. An appeal to Supreme Court from a circuit court order denying a motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution, is not maintainable under Sec. 630, Code Crim. Proc. 1903 (Rev. Code 1919, Sec. 4808), providing that if a defendant in a criminal prosecution, whose trial has not been postponed upon his application,- is not brought to trial at next term at which the indietment, etc., is triable, court must order .prosecution dismissed unless good cause to contrary appears; there being no statutory provision permitting review, on direct appeal, of a trial court order made upon such motion under said section; and Supreme-Court is without Jurisdiction to consider questions of law or to -review facts presented on such purported appeal.
Summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Meade County. Hon. James McNenny, Judge. . In ■ a prosecution -by- the State against the 'defendant, Joshua Guffey, Circuit 'Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the criminal prosecution, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Smith

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SMITH, J.

This is a direct appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss a criminal prosecution against appellant. The motion was founded upon section 630, Code Crim. Proc. 1903 (Rev. Code 1919, § 4808), which provides that:

“If a defendant, prosecuted for a public offense, whose trial 'has not been postponed upon his application, is not brought to trial at the next term 'of court in which the indictment or information is triable, the court must order the prosecution to be dismissed, unless good cause to the contrary is shown.”

*533 There is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure permitting a review, upon direct appeal, of an order, of a trial court made upon a motion- to dismiss a prosecution under this section. This court, therefore, is without jurisdiction to consider the questions of law or to review the facts attempted to be presented upon this purported appeal. State v. Stunkard, 28 S. D. 311, 133 N. W. 253 ; State v. Taylor, 37 S. D. 229, 157 N. W. 819 ; section 5031, Rev. Code 1919.

The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 11957: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Davis86 N.W.2d 174 (S.D. 1957)
  2. State v. Sweeney203 N.W. 460 (S.D. 1925)

Most recent

  1. State v. Davis86 N.W.2d 174 (S.D. 1957)
  2. State v. Sweeney203 N.W. 460 (S.D. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Stunkard, 133 N.W. 253 (S.D. 1911) 11
State v. Taylor, 157 N.W. 819 (S.D. 1916) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list