TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

National Casing Co. v. Schmechel

Nat'l Casing Co. v. Schmechel, 182 N.W. 526 (S.D. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 2, 1921
Docket
No. File No. 4801
Judges
McCoy, Smith
Citations
182 N.W. 52644 S.D. 1011921 S.D. LEXIS 46
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Headnotes
Appeals — Order Excusiing' Default Before Judgment Granting Leave to Defendant, Whether Appealable. An appeal from an order of county court excusing default before judgment and granting leave to answer and defend in an action, is not appealable, (following Paper Supply Co. v. ¡McDonald, 44 S. D. 100, 182 N. W. 526) hence, without motion to dismiss appeal, Supreme Court will take notice of a jurisdictional question, and appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. McCoy, J., not sitting.
Summary
Appeal from County Court, Spink County. . Hon. E. W. Coolidge, Judge. Action by the National Casing Company, a corporation, against Julius Schmechel. From an order excusing defendant’s default before judgment, and granting leave to answer and defend in the suit, plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Smith

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SMITH, J.

Appeal from an order of the county court of ■Spink county, excusing default before judgment, and granting leave to answer and defend in an action pending in said court. For the reasons stated in Paper Supply Co. v. MacDonald, 182 N. W. 526 , the order sought to be reviewed is not appealable. In that case there was a m/otion to dismiss the appeal, while in the present case no such motion was made. The court, however, is required to take notice of jurisdictional questions, whether presented by the parties or not. Winner Milling Co. v. C. & N. W. Ry. Co., 181 N. W. 195 ; Odell v. Coquolette et al., 103 Iowa, 435 , 72 N. W. 670 .

As this court is without jurisdiction, the appeal will be dismissed.

McCOY, J., not sitting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11936: 21940: 21947: 11965: 11977: 119272026peak 1936 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. County School Board v. Cottonwood School District No. 41137 N.W.2d 882 (S.D. 1965)
  2. State v. Hare260 N.W.2d 224 (S.D. 1977)
  3. C., M., St. P. P.R. Co. v. R.R. Commrs.266 N.W. 660 (S.D. 1936)
  4. In re Swanson's Estate293 N.W. 361 (S.D. 1940)
  5. In re Swanson's Estate28 N.W.2d 663 (S.D. 1947)
  6. Downs v. Bruce Independent School District No. 49216 N.W. 949 (S.D. 1927)

Most recent

  1. State v. Hare260 N.W.2d 224 (S.D. 1977)
  2. County School Board v. Cottonwood School District No. 41137 N.W.2d 882 (S.D. 1965)
  3. In re Swanson's Estate28 N.W.2d 663 (S.D. 1947)
  4. In re Swanson's Estate293 N.W. 361 (S.D. 1940)
  5. Nelson v. First National Bank & Trust Co.293 N.W. 361 (S.D. 1940)
  6. C., M., St. P. P.R. Co. v. R.R. Commrs.266 N.W. 660 (S.D. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Winner Milling Co. v. Chicago & North Western Ry. Co., 181 N.W. 195 (S.D. 1921) 8
Odell v. Coquolette, 103 Iowa 435 (1897) 8
Paper Supply Co. v. MacDonald, 182 N.W. 526 (S.D. 1921) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list