TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Wessington Springs v. FidelIty & Deposit Co.

CITY OF WESSINGTON SPRINGS v. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND

City of Wessington Springs v. FidelIty & Deposit Co., 208 N.W. 580 (S.D. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 22, 1926
Docket
No. File No. 5721
Judges
Gates, Lieu, Miser, Sherwood
Citations
208 N.W. 58050 S.D. 1331926 S.D. LEXIS 301

Opinion of the Court — Gates

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GATES, R J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order overruling their demurrers to the complaint. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a city of the second class under the alder-manic form of government; the appointment and qualification of defendant Smith as city treasurer; the furnishing of an official bond by -him, with defendant Eidelity & Deposit Company as surety, which bond is set forth in full; its acceptance by the city; that on February 4, 1924, the Farmers’ Savings Bank of Wessington Springs, a state bank, which had complied with the Depositors’ Guaranty Fund Law, became insolvent, and was turned over to the superintendent of banks, and is in process of liquidation ; that on said date the city treasurer had city funds on deposit in said bank to the amount of $13, 154.68; a demand therefor against both defendants and their refusal — and prays for judgment for said amount, with interest from the date of the demand.

All of the points raised have been considered and disposed of in Edgerton Ind. Con. School Dist. v. Volz, 50 S. D. 107, 208 N. W. 576.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the order in this case overruling the demurrers to the complaint is reversed.

MISER, Circuit Judge, sitting in lieu of SHERWOOD, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 11931: 119302026peak 1930 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Edgerton Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. Volz, 208 N.W. 576 (S.D. 1926) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list