TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Union Central Life Insurance v. Lindermann

UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LINDERMANN

Union Cent. Life Ins. v. Lindermann, 210 N.W. 156 (S.D. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 30, 1926
Docket
No. File No. 6222
Judges
Dillon, Gates
Citations
210 N.W. 15650 S.D. 3311926 S.D. LEXIS 375

Opinion of the Court — Gates

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GATES, P. J .

In this case appellant served and filed with his notice of appeal an undertaking in the sum1 of $250, conditioned only for the payment of costs on the appeal and not for the payment of damages that might be awarded1 against him on the appeal. Section 3150, Rev. Code 1919, provides that the undertaking must be to the effect that appellant will pay all costs and ’damages which may be awarded against him on the appeal not exceeding $250. The undertaking designates the state of South Dakota as the obligee instead of respondent. For these reasons respondent moves to dismiss the appeal. Upon the return day appellant says he cannot find the record and does not know whether-the facts are as above stated, but, if they are, he says it was due to error and inadvertence on the part of his attorneys, *332 and asks that he be permitted to amend the undertaking to make it conform to the requirements of said section 3150.

Assuming, without deciding, that upon a proper application such relief might be granted, yet it cannot be allowed upon this showing. The surety or sureties on the undertaking have not joined in the request to amend, and this court is powerless to allow an amendment to the undertaking without the surety’s consent.

The appeal was ineffectual for any purpose. Section 3150, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

DILLON, J., not sitting.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1932: 119322026peak 1932 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Haines v. Waite244 N.W. 113 (S.D. 1932)

Most recent

  1. Haines v. Waite244 N.W. 113 (S.D. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list