TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commercial & Savings Bank v. Felderman

COMMERCIAL AND SAVINGS BANK v. FELDERMAN

Commercial & Sav. Bank v. Felderman, 223 N.W. 330 (S.D. 1929)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
South Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1929
Docket
No. File No. 6078
Judges
Brown, Burch, Campbell, Sherwood
Citations
223 N.W. 33054 S.D. 4011929 S.D. LEXIS 339

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover on four promissory notes. Defendants answered admitting the execution of the notes, but alleged that they had been induced to execute the notes by fraud and misrepresentation, and without consideration. To this answer plaintiff demurred on the ground that the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the causes of action pleaded in the complaint. The demurrer was overruled by the trial court, and plaintiff appeals.

We are of the opinion that the answer is sufficient to raise an issue of fact and that the demurrer was properly overruled.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

SHERWOOD., P. J., and BURCH and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur. BROWN, J., absent and not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list