TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. Abrams

MORTON G. THALHIMER, INC. v. AARON ABRAMS

Morton G. Thalhimer, Inc. v. Abrams, 59 S.E.2d 358 (N.C. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 10, 1950
Judges
Pee
Citations
59 S.E.2d 358232 N.C. 961950 N.C. LEXIS 407

Opinion of the Court — Pee

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Curiam.

While it appears from careful reading and consideration of the matters set up in defendant’s further defense that there are averments of fraud, it is manifest that these averments are insufficient to state a cause of action against plaintiff for actionable fraud. And what the effect of the averments is in respect of the lessees and their assignee is a matter foreign to the issue between plaintiff and defendant. Hence in the order striking the further defense, no error is made to appear.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 11967: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Miller v. First National Bank67 S.E.2d 362 (N.C. 1951)
  2. MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of Raleigh155 S.E.2d 543 (N.C. 1967)

Most recent

  1. MILNER HOTELS, INCORPORATED v. City of Raleigh155 S.E.2d 543 (N.C. 1967)
  2. Miller v. First National Bank67 S.E.2d 362 (N.C. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list