State v. Roddy

STATE v. WAYNE BUFORD RODDY

State v. Roddy, 117 S.E.2d 401 (N.C. 1960)

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided: December 14, 1960
Judges: Cueiam
Citations: 117 S.E.2d 401253 N.C. 5741960 N.C. LEXIS 676

Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court — Cueiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Peb Cueiam.

Defendant excepts to the facts found by the court, but supported by the evidence as they are, the findings are conclusive. Based on the finding that there was no newly discovered evidence, there was no ground on which defendant’s motion could be granted. S. v. Casey, 201 N.C. 620 , 161 S.E. 81 . The judgment denying the motion is

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State v. Britt360 S.E.2d 660 (N.C. 1987)
State v. Nickerson359 S.E.2d 760 (N.C. 1987)
State v. Shelton205 S.E.2d 316 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974)

Most recent

State v. Britt360 S.E.2d 660 (N.C. 1987)
State v. Nickerson359 S.E.2d 760 (N.C. 1987)
State v. Shelton205 S.E.2d 316 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

Depth	Case	Cited by
	State v. Casey, 161 S.E. 81 (N.C. 1931)	53

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list