Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.

JOHN H. HARDY v. BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendant JOHN ROGER McKINNEY, Third Party Tort-Feasor (8710IC26) ALBERT R. WELLS, Employee v. BRANTLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendant JOHN ROGER McKINNEY, Third Party Tort-Feasor (8710IC27)

Hardy v. Brantley Constr. Co., 366 S.E.2d 485 (N.C. 1988)

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided: April 6, 1988
Docket: No. 650A87
Citations: 366 S.E.2d 485322 N.C. 1061988 N.C. LEXIS 121

Cited by 3 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The portion of the Court of Appeals opinion which vacates in part the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission is before us by virtue of the dissenting opinion of Phillips, J. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion is reversed.

We conclude that defendants’ petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed. The result is that the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission remains in full force and effect.

*107 In plaintiffs’ appeal, reversed.

In defendants’ appeal, discretionary review improvidently allowed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(under N.C.G.S. § 97-90, attorney’s fee taken from employee’s share of judgment may not exceed one-third of amount recovered)

Hieb v. Lowery, 516 S.E.2d 621 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)
(for the reasons stated in the dissent)

Tinsley v. City of Charlotte, 747 S.E.2d 145 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Miller v. Dorr262 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Kan. 2003)
Hieb v. Lowery516 S.E.2d 621 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)
Tinsley v. City of Charlotte747 S.E.2d 145 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)

Most recent

Tinsley v. City of Charlotte747 S.E.2d 145 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013)
Miller v. Dorr262 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Kan. 2003)
Hieb v. Lowery516 S.E.2d 621 (N.C. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list