Cox v. Hozelock, Ltd.
Cox v. Hozelock, Ltd., 414 S.E.2d 752 (N.C. 1992)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Motion by plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 March 1992. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 March 1992.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(assertion of personal jurisdiction over defendant English company which had manufactured defective water sprayer, then sold its product to distributors and eventually to the North Carolina plaintiff, who was injured when it exploded in his face)
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.