TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stockum v. State

Roy Stockum v. State of Ohio

Stockum v. State, 139 N.E. 855 (Ohio 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 26, 1922
Docket
No. 17612
Judges
Clark, Hough, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson, Wanamaker
Citations
139 N.E. 8551 Ohio Law. Abs. 72106 Ohio St. 2491922 Ohio LEXIS 242

Opinion of the Court — Clark

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

CLARK, J.:

1. The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States does not control nor is it a limitation upon the criminal procedure -of the several states. (Prescott v. State, 19 Ohio St., 184 , approved and followed.)

2. Imprisonment “at hard labor” of a person convicted of an offense under Section 1654, General Code, is lawful and does not violate any provision of the federal or state constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Hough, Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1927: 11929: 11932: 21933: 21935: 119272026peak 1932 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.184 N.E. 1 (Ohio 1933)
  2. State v. Kassay184 N.E. 521 (Ohio 1932)
  3. Sheward v. State159 N.E. 831 (Ohio 1927)
  4. Ingham v. State172 N.E. 401 (Ohio Ct. App. 1929)
  5. Webster v. State ex rel. Altick195 N.E. 548 (Ohio 1935)
  6. Municipal Court v. State ex rel. Platter126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 103 (1933)

Most recent

  1. Webster v. State ex rel. Altick195 N.E. 548 (Ohio 1935)
  2. Munic. Court v. State, Ex Rel.184 N.E. 1 (Ohio 1933)
  3. Municipal Court v. State ex rel. Platter126 Ohio St. (N.S.) 103 (1933)
  4. State v. Kassay184 N.E. 521 (Ohio 1932)
  5. Stewart v. State181 N.E. 111 (Ohio Ct. App. 1932)
  6. Ingham v. State172 N.E. 401 (Ohio Ct. App. 1929)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list