TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Auth v. Kuroki Elevator Co.

MRS. E. G. AUTH v. KUROKI ELEVATOR COMPANY

Auth v. Kuroki Elevator Co., 167 N.W. 389 (N.D. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
North Dakota Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 12, 1918
Judges
Birdzell, Grace
Citations
167 N.W. 38939 N.D. 2451918 N.D. LEXIS 35
Headnotes
Appeal — failure to prosecute — dismissal — motion for — order to show cause on — record already sent up — will not he granted. Where an order to show cause to dismiss a case for want of prosecution or for failure to perfect the record on appeal has not been procured until after the record on appeal has been fully perfected, the appeal should not, ordinarily, be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Order to show cause why appeal should not be dismissed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Grace

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Grace, J.

This is an order to show cause why the appeal in the above-entitled action should not be dismissed for nonprosecution and for unnecessary delay in causing’ the clerk of the district court to transmit the judgment roll and record on appeal, and delay in serving and filing appellant’s brief. It appears from the record before us, including the affidavit in support of the order to show cause, that all of the proceedings necessary to perfect such appeal,' including the filing of the record in supreme court and the service of the brief on appeal, had all been had, and all of such things were done and performed prior to the time the order to show cause was procured. At the time such order to show cause was procured, the appeal was in such condition and was so perfected that it could have been disposed of upon its merits. There were *246 two appeals, and order to show cause why such appeal should not be dismissed was procured in each appeal. It is held that such appeals in the above-entitled action should not be dismissed for the reason above stated.

Birdzell, J., did not participate.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list