TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Miles v. Pendell

: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Woodrow Wilson Miles, and Clinton F. Taylor James S. Caroline v. Carl Pendell, Unit Manager

Miles v. Pendell, 43 F.3d 1467 (4th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 27, 1994
Docket
No. 94-6884
Citations
43 F.3d 14671994 WL 714189
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

43 F.3d 1467

: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Woodrow Wilson MILES, Plaintiff Appellant, and Clinton F. Taylor; James S. Caroline, Plaintiffs, v. Carl PENDELL, Unit Manager, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6884.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 20, 1994. Decided Dec. 27, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-186-R)

Woodrow Wilson Miles, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. * Miles v. Pendell, No. CA-93-186-R (E.D. Va. June 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

* The district court properly dismissed the claims against Appellee in his individual capacity as barred by qualified immunity. Collinson v. Gott, 895 F.2d 994, 998 (4th Cir.1990). Although the district court did not apply the correct standard in dismissing the claims against Appellee in his official capacity, the error was harmless because suits for damages against federal officials in their official capacities are barred by sovereign immunity. Hagemeier v. Block, 806 F.2d 197, 202 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1054 (1987); Gilbert v. DaGrossa, 756 F.2d 1455, 1458 (9th Cir.1985)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Gilbert v. Dagrossa, 756 F.2d 1455 (9th Cir. 1985) 258
Collinson v. Gott, 895 F.2d 994 (4th Cir. 1990) 108
Hagemeier v. Block, 806 F.2d 197 (8th Cir. 1986) 30

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list