Ivy v. Dudley
Ivy v. Dudley, Admr., Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, (Seven cases.)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The question presented is whether each of the claimants “quit his work without just cause or has been discharged for just cause in connection with his work,” within the meaning of that provision as found in Section 4141.29 (D)(2)(a), Revised Code. This question is answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in Marcum v. Ohio Match Co., 4 Ohio App. 2d 95 .
The judgment of the Court of Appeals in each case is affirmed.
Judgments affirmed.
Taft, C. J., ZimmeRmah, Matthias, O’Neill, HeRbebt, SchsteideR and Beowh, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Lorain County Auditor v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family Services
- Mathieu v. Dudley
- Russell v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation
- Akron v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
- Salzl v. Gibson Greeting Cards, Inc.
Most recent
- Akron v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. Dir., Ohio Department of Job & Family Services
- Lorain County Auditor v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission
- Parks v. Employment Security Commission
- Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Oszust
- Salzl v. Gibson Greeting Cards, Inc.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.