State v. Davis
The State of Ohio v. Davis
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
At the trial the state commented to the jury that the defendant failed to testify at the preliminary hearing. The court charged the jury that, by constitutional and statutory provisions, failure of accused to testify at his trial may be considered by the court and jury and may be the subject of comment by counsel, but that a preliminary hearing before a county judge is not a trial and “the fact that defendant did not testify at that hearing is not proper to be made the subject of comment by counsel in this trial and you are instructed to disregard that entirely, the preliminary hearing.” In our opinion, this charge could not correct the error in the aforementioned conduct of the state.
The motion for leave to appeal is allowed. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609 , and O’Connor v. Ohio, 17 L. Ed. 2d 189 , and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.