Ross v. Common Pleas Court
Ross v. Common Pleas Court of Auglaize County
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Habeas corpus is not available where it appears that the sentencing court had jurisdiction to render the judgment of conviction. Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4 . In this case, petitioner makes no claim of lack of jurisdiction by the respondent court.
Moreover, petitioner does not allege that his guilty plea, entered while he was represented by counsel, was not voluntary. “A defendant who enters a voluntary plea of *324 guilty while represented by competent counsel waives all nonjurisdictional defects in prior stages of the proceedings.” Crockett v. Haskins (1966), 372 F. 2d 475 .
The motion to dismiss the complaint is sustained and the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
0 ’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Leach and Brown, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(a defendant represented by competent counsel who enters a voluntary guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects in prior proceedings including speedy trial)
-
(voluntary plea waives all non- jurisdictional, appealable errors which may have occurred prior to the plea)
-
(valid guilty plea by counseled defendant waives all nonjurisdictional defects in prior stages of proceedings)
Cited by 78 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.