TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Seliskar

The State of Ohio v. Seliskar

State v. Seliskar, 298 N.E.2d 582 (Ohio 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 3, 1973
Docket
No. 72-723
Judges
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Citations
298 N.E.2d 58235 Ohio St. 2d 9564 Ohio Op. 2d 581973 Ohio LEXIS 315

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s single proposition of law reads:

“Where the evidence, exclusive of that provided by the defendant-appellant, raised the issue of self-defense, and the trial court refused to instruct the jury on that issue in the absence of defendant-appellant’s testifying on his own behalf, such refusal by the trial court constitutes a violation of defendant-appellant’s right to immunity *96 from self-incrimination as provided by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”

“ ‘Self defense in Ohio * * * is regarded as affirmative defense,’ ” to be established “ ‘by preponderating evidence.’ ” State v. Johnson (1972), 31 Ohio St. 2d 106, 120 . See State v. Poole (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 18 .

"When the trial judge informed appellant that no instructions would be given on the issue of self-defense unless appellant testified, he stated that self-defense is an affirmative defense; that self-defense had not been established at that point.

Inasmuch as self-defense is an affirmative defense requiring proof by a preponderance of the evidence, it is incumbent upon a defendant claiming self-defense to offer evidence tending to establish that defense, including, if necessary, his own testimony. State v. Champion (1924), 109 Ohio St. 281 . If a defendant cannot provide evidence on the issue of self-defense other than his own testimony, then, in order to avail himself of the defense, he must testify. In such event, the choice is that of the defendant, and, once he has decided to rely on self-defense and is required by the circumstances to testify in order to prove that defense, he necessarily must waive his constitutional right to remain silent.

As observed in State v. Champion, supra, the elements or self-defense can best be established by testimony of a defendant as no one is in better position than defendant to provide evidence to aid the jury in determining whether defendant’s acts were justified.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 32 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 11976: 31980: 41982: 31983: 11984: 11986: 21992: 11999: 12000: 32001: 12003: 12005: 12008: 22011: 12013: 12015: 12016: 12017: 12018: 12021: 119752026peak 1980 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lincoln Isaac v. Ted Engle, Superintendent Chilicothe Correctional Institute646 F.2d 1122 (6th Cir. 1980)
  2. State v. Hawthorne2018 Ohio 1180, 101 N.E.3d 701
  3. Lincoln Isaac v. Ted Engle, Superintendent646 F.2d 1129 (6th Cir. 1980)
  4. Kenneth L. Bell v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correctional Institute635 F.2d 575 (6th Cir. 1980)
  5. State v. Caldwell607 N.E.2d 1096 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992)
  6. State v. Robinson351 N.E.2d 88 (Ohio 1976) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. State v. Kerns2021 Ohio 127
  2. State v. Hawthorne2018 Ohio 1180, 101 N.E.3d 701
  3. Warren v. Chipps2017 Ohio 7295
  4. State of Arizona v. Maverick Kemp Gray372 P.3d 999 (Ariz. 2016)
  5. State v. Delaffuente2015 Ohio 4917
  6. State v. Eichelbrenner2013 Ohio 1194

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Champion, 142 N.E. 141 (Ohio 1924) 103
State v. Poole, 294 N.E.2d 888 (Ohio 1973) 161
State v. Johnson, 285 N.E.2d 751 (Ohio 1972) 48

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list