Salyers v. Burkhart
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The motion to certify the record in this cause was allowed because of the breadth of the holding in the Court of Appeals and the importance of the proposition of law enunciated.
Although this court agrees that the question of tort liability of teachers acting within the scope of their daily teaching responsibilites is one which should be authoritatively answered, the facts of the instant case are inappropriate to support the announcement of a rule of broad and general application.
Hence, solely under the circumstances at bar and the allegations of the complaint herein, a majority of the court agrees that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be, and hereby is, affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
O’Netll, C. J., HERBERT, Stern, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan and Celebbezze, LT,, dissent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.