State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas
The State, ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal, and “prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.” State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 86, 88 .
*59 The judgment'of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint in prohibition, is affirmed: '■ ' ■Judgment affirmed.
O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Ceeebrezze, "W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.