TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Grosser v. Boy

The State, ex rel. Grosser v. Boy

State ex rel. Grosser v. Boy, 347 N.E.2d 539 (Ohio 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Ohio Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 12, 1976
Docket
No. 75-1019
Judges
Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
Citations
347 N.E.2d 53946 Ohio St. 2d 18475 Ohio Op. 2d 2281976 Ohio LEXIS 614

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

R. C. 2731.11 provides, in part, as follows:

“If judgment in a proceeding for a writ of mandamus is rendered for the plaintiff, the relator may' recover the *185 damages which he has sustained, to be ascertained by the ■court or a jury # * * .as in a civil action, and costs. * * * ”

Appellants recognize the general rule in Ohio that “in the absence of a statutory provision making attorney fees a part of costs, such fees cannot be so taxed” (State, ex rel. Michaels, v. Morse [1956], 165 Ohio St. 599 , 607), and it is evident that R. C. 2731.11 does not expressly provide for the recovery of attorney' fees. See Sorin v. Bd. of Edn. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 177 .

Nevertheless, appellants argue that the “public benefit” conferred by their successful mandamus action, and the term “damages” in R. C. 2731.11, support the necessity of the award of attorney fees herein. However, this cause neither meets the' situation set forth in State, ex rel. White, v. Cleveland (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 37 , wherein the bestowal ■of a public benefit concomitant with a statutory authorization for attorney fees was held sufficient to demand consideration of allowance of those fees, nor is the “bad.faith, vexatious, wanton, obdurate or oppressive conduct exception” to the “American rule” that attorney fees' are not recoverable in the absence of statutory authorization demonstrated to be applicable to this cause. Sorin v. Bd. of Edn., supra.

With respect to the recovery of appellants’-costs expended in the Court of Appeals, as distinguished from the •claim for the recovery of attorney fees, no reason was stated by that court for overruling the motion -for costs. As the prevailing party, and in the absence- of persuasive reasons to the contrary, appellants should: be awarded their ■costs.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is modified, and appellants are awarded their costs in the -Court of Appeals. The judgment of the Court of Appeals as to denial of an award for attorney fees is affirmed.

Judgment accordingly.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 36 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 21980: 11981: 11982: 11983: 21984: 31985: 21987: 41988: 31989: 11990: 11993: 21995: 11997: 11999: 12000: 12001: 22008: 32009: 22011: 12019: 119772026peak 1987 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Chapnick v. East Cleveland City School District Board of Education755 N.E.2d 883 (Ohio 2001)
  2. Sutherland v. Nationwide General Insurance657 N.E.2d 281 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995)
  3. Laituri v. Nero723 N.E.2d 1119 (Ohio Ct. App. 1999)
  4. Lake Pointe Townhomes Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bruce900 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
  5. State ex rel. Gerchak v. Tablack690 N.E.2d 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997) · Concurrence
  6. McClure v. Fischer Attached Homes2008 Ohio 2676, 889 N.E.2d 602

Most recent

  1. Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel2019 Ohio 3756
  2. Roll v. Bacon2011 Ohio 6972
  3. State ex rel. Crumbley v. City of Cleveland923 N.E.2d 200 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
  4. Custom Rubber Corp. v. ATS Specialized, Inc.633 F. Supp. 2d 495 (N.D. Ohio 2009)
  5. Lake Pointe Townhomes Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bruce900 N.E.2d 636 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
  6. Grine v. Sylvania Schools Bd. of Edn., L-06-1314 (3-31-2008)2008 Ohio 1562 (2008)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Sorin v. Bd. of Educ., 347 N.E.2d 527 (Ohio 1976) 214
State ex rel. White v. City of Cleveland, 295 N.E.2d 665 (Ohio 1973) 45

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list