State ex rel. Corona v. Harris
The State, ex rel. Corona v. Harris, Judge
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
App. R. 9(C) provides for narrative statements only “[i]f no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable* * *.”
Appellant’s complaint does not allege that a verbatim statement of the Juvenile Court proceedings cannot be provided; and appellant concedes that if a verbatim statement exists, there is no need for a narrative statement.
Until it is clearly established that no verbatim transcript can be provided, appellee has no clear legal duty to sign and settle the narrative statement.
For reason of the foregoing, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the mandamus complaint, is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.