United States v. Kevin M. Dawson
Opinion
44 F.3d 1031 310 U.S.App.D.C. 142
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America v. Kevin M. DAWSON, Appellant.
No. 94-3008.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1994.
Before: WALD, HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
1
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is 2
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed December 30, 1993, denying appellant's motion to vacate, set aside, and correct sentence, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.
3
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.