TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lamar M. Jolly Harriet T. Jolly v. Great Western Bank

Lamar M. Jolly Harriet T. Jolly v. Great Western Bank, 45 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 1994)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 29, 1994
Docket
No. 92-2138
Citations
45 F.3d 4261994 WL 7176261994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40376

Opinion

45 F.3d 426 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Lamar M. JOLLY; Harriet T. Jolly, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. GREAT WESTERN BANK, Defendant Appellee.

No. 92-2138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 15, 1993. Decided: Dec. 29, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-92-53, BK-91-42581-B)

Lamar M. Jolly, Harriet T. Jolly, Appellants Pro Se. Robyn Hylton Hansen, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, P.C., Newport News, VA, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order dismissing their petition filed under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, with prejudice to their right to refile for a period of 180 days. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jolly v. Great Western Bank, No. CA-92-53 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1995: 11996: 11997: 12005: 12010: 12023: 12025: 119952026peak 1995 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Spear203 B.R. 349 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)
  2. Marcus C Purdy and Amanda J PurdyNo. 19-04614 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2023)
  3. Joseph David RiceNo. 25-30341 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. June 17, 2025)
  4. Leavitt v. Soto (In re Leavitt)97 Daily Journal DAR 9871 (9th Cir. BAP 1997)
  5. In re Van Eck425 B.R. 54 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2010)
  6. In re Norton319 B.R. 671 (Bankr. D. Utah 2005)

Most recent

  1. Joseph David RiceNo. 25-30341 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. June 17, 2025)
  2. Marcus C Purdy and Amanda J PurdyNo. 19-04614 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2023)
  3. In re Van Eck425 B.R. 54 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2010)
  4. In re Norton319 B.R. 671 (Bankr. D. Utah 2005)
  5. Leavitt v. Soto (In re Leavitt)97 Daily Journal DAR 9871 (9th Cir. BAP 1997)
  6. In re Spear203 B.R. 349 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1996)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list