TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Betty A. Thompson v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General

Thompson v. Runyon, 46 F.3d 1136 (8th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 17, 1995
Docket
No. 94-2149
Citations
46 F.3d 11364 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 51270 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1601995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6707
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

46 F.3d 1136 70 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 160 , 4 A.D. Cases 512

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action. Betty A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2149.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 15, 1994. Filed: Jan. 17, 1995.

Before BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, * Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Betty A. Thompson, a part-time flexible window/distribution clerk at the Liberty, Missouri, post office, filed this action against the United States Postal Service alleging sex, age, disability, and retaliation discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-16, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 , and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 701 . After a thirteen-day trial, the district court 1 issued a 135-page opinion and order directing that judgment be entered in favor of defendant on all claims. Ms. Thompson timely appealed.

2

On appeal, Ms. Thompson contends that the district court erred in concluding that her complaints prior to December 1989 are time- barred, in refusing to apply the doctrine of equitable tolling because of the alleged misconduct of defendant's EEO counselor, in concluding that she failed to prove a prima facie case of disability discrimination, in failing to find that the Postal Service has not accommodated her disability, and in concluding that the Postal Service has not retaliated against her for protected EEO and union activity. After carefully considering these contentions in light of the trial record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough opinion. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

* The HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation 1

The HONORABLE ROBERT E. LARSEN, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, who tried the case by consent of the parties. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 (c)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Young v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 871 F. Supp. 820 (D. Maryland 1994) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list