Ozur v. Commonwealth
J. Ozur v. Commonwealth
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Prentis, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The accused has been found guilty of storing intoxicating liquor for sale.
He assigns as error the refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as based upon insufficient evidence.
*770 It is unnecessary to say more than that the testimony introduced for the Commonwealth shows that one gallon of whiskey wias found in his store, concealed under the counter, with a glass having the odor of whiskey and indicating recent use, either on the counter or under it, and two and one-half gallons more in a warehouse on the same premises, which were controlled by him as a tenant.
It is unnecessary to recite the evidence in detail, but our judgment is that the jury were justified in discrediting his attempts to relieve himself of the presumption of guilt ¡arising out of these facts, and therefore the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.