TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kendall H. Breedlove v. Tysons Manor Homeowners Association, and Charlotte M. Schow John Doe

Breedlove v. Tysons Manor Homeowners Ass'n, & Charlotte M. Schow John Doe, 51 F.3d 265 (4th Cir. 1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 4, 1995
Docket
No. 94-2316
Citations
51 F.3d 2651995 WL 1443431995 U.S. App. LEXIS 13061
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

51 F.3d 265

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kendall H. BREEDLOVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TYSONS MANOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Charlotte M. SCHOW; John Doe, Defendants.

No. 94-2316.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 7, 1995. Decided April 4, 1995.

Kendall H. Breedlove, appellant pro se. John David McGavin, Lewis, Trichilo & Bancroft, P.C., Fairfax, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. * Breedlove v. Tysons Manor Homeowners Ass'n, No. CA-94-647-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED * We deny Appellant's motions for certification. We also deny Appellant's "Motion For Written, Published, Self-Contained Memorandum Opinion Of The Court's Findings, Rulings And Decision" pursuant to 4th Cir. I.O.P. 36.4

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list