TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co. v. United States

Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co., Inc. v. United States

Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co. v. United States, 570 F.2d 945 (C.C.P.A. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
February 23, 1978
Docket
No. 77-28
Judges
Baldwin, Lane, Market, Miller, Rich, Udges
Citations
570 F.2d 94565 C.C.P.A. 521978 CCPA LEXIS 325

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the judgment of the Customs Court which sustained classification of an imported bakery oven under item 661.30 TSUS, as modified by T.D. 68-9. 79 Cust. Ct. 28 , C.D. 4709, 436 F. Supp. 398 (1977). After a thorough consideration of appellant’s arguments, we are in full agreement with the opinion of the Customs Court, authored by Judge Newman, and, accordingly, we adopt it as our own.

We agree with appellant that the issue of the doctrine of entireties was before the Customs Court, but it seems clear to us that Judge Newman correctly treated the issue. Appellant’s position that the imported oven is an integral part of a breadstick production line, which line should be classified as an entirety, is not well taken. As Judge Newman found, the testimony of appellant’s own witnesses established that the importation at bar did not comprise a complete breadstick production line, since it did not include packaging or wrapping machinery. Appellant’s remarks, posited on appeal, alleging that a complete breadstick line need not include packaging or wrapping machinery, are contrary to the testimony below and can be given no weight. The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 11981: 11983: 11984: 11988: 11989: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States723 F. Supp. 805 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)
  2. Siemens America, Inc. v. United States496 F. Supp. 266 (Cust. Ct. 1980)
  3. United States v. Watches, Watch Parts, Calculators & Misc. Parts692 F. Supp. 1317 (S.D. Fla. 1988)
  4. Nichimen Co., Inc. v. The United States726 F.2d 1580 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  5. Nichimen Co., Inc. v. United States565 F. Supp. 148 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)
  6. Franklin Industries, Inc. v. United States1 Ct. Int'l Trade 349 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

Most recent

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States723 F. Supp. 805 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)
  2. United States v. Watches, Watch Parts, Calculators & Misc. Parts692 F. Supp. 1317 (S.D. Fla. 1988)
  3. Nichimen Co., Inc. v. The United States726 F.2d 1580 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  4. Nichimen Co., Inc. v. United States565 F. Supp. 148 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983)
  5. Franklin Industries, Inc. v. United States1 Ct. Int'l Trade 349 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)
  6. Siemens America, Inc. v. United States496 F. Supp. 266 (Cust. Ct. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co. v. United States, 436 F. Supp. 398 (Cust. Ct. 1977) 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list