TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gasser v. United States

Rene B. GASSER v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant Gordon F. BAILEY v. United States

Gasser v. United States, 22 Cl. Ct. 165 (Ct. Cl. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Court of Claims · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
December 4, 1990
Docket
Nos. 33-84L, 177-84L
Judges
Bruggink
Citations
22 Cl. Ct. 1651990 U.S. Claims LEXIS 5161990 WL 192321

Opinion of the Court — Bruggink

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BRUGGINK, District Judge.

ORDER

An opinion finding in favor of the Mosqueda plaintiffs was entered on March 4, 1988. Judgment was entered on November 2, 1988. 14 Cl.Ct. 476 . The action is currently pending before the court on: Plaintiff’s Motion To Compel And Motion For Attorney’s Fees And Declaration Of Leroy A. Abelson, filed September 25, 1989; Defendant’s Motion For Relief From Judgment, filed November 1, 1989; Plaintiff’s Objection To, And Motion To Strike, Exhibit 9 Attached To Defendant’s Reply Brief (“Reply To Plaintiff’s Opposition To Defendant’s Motion For Relief From Judgment”), filed December 5, 1989; Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To File Report of Hector Teran Teran, Secretary General Of Baja California, filed January 19,1990; and (Joint) Stipulation For Settlement And Entry Of Final Judgment, filed November 30, 1990.

The Mosqueda plaintiffs have entered into a stipulation for settlement and entry of final judgment, conditioned upon entry of an order vacating the earlier opinion and judgment. For good cause shown, the court adopts the stipulation. Accordingly, the following is ORDERED:

1. The opinion of March 4, 1988 is withdrawn and the judgment of November 2, 1988 is vacated with respect to all plaintiffs except Gordon F. Bailey.

2. Plaintiff’s motions of September 25, 1989, December 5, 1989, and January 19, 1990 and defendant’s motion of November 1, 1989 are denied as moot.

3. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment as to all remaining plaintiffs in accordance with the terms of the stipulation attached hereto.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Gasser v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 476 (Ct. Cl. 1988) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list