TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Russell v. Sisson

Thomas Nathan RUSSELL v. Vinton E. SISSON

Russell v. Sisson, 4 F.2d 1014 (D.C. Cir. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 6, 1925
Docket
No. Patent Appeal No. 1707
Judges
Martin, Orsdel, Robb
Citations
4 F.2d 101455 App. D.C. 4011925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3165

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Sisson. The Patent Office, we are convinced, has reached a correct conclusion on the facts and properly applied the law. No new question being involved, we are content to rest our decision upon the reasoning of the tribunals of the Patent Office, and therefore affirm the decision from which this appeal was taken. Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James Stewart Walker v. James Bailey245 F.2d 486 (C.C.P.A. 1957)

Most recent

  1. James Stewart Walker v. James Bailey245 F.2d 486 (C.C.P.A. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list